Updates from March, 2010

  • Brian

    "72% of organizations recoup their BPM investment within 2 years" according to new BPM study

    brian 12:28 pm on November 27, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , business process automation, , business process managemet, , SOA

    According to recent research by AIIM, 50% of organizations using Business Process Management (BPM) tools achieve a payback of their investment in 18 months or less. In all, 72% recoup their BPM spend within 2 years.

    Wow!

    This is some wonderful new data on the power of BPM in the enterprise today.  Also interesting is the finding that once a company has implemented an initial Business Process Management project, additional projects take an average of 8 to complete. In addition to cost savings, users report faster process throughput and improved compliance from more consistent processes.  No surprises there.

    A majority of respondents reported that they have only addressed 1/5th of the potentially profitable BPM projects in their organisation, and consider BPM to be “significant” or “imperative” to their business.

    Other important notes from the study include information on what tend to be the most popular processes for organizations to automate.  These processes include: accounts payables (scanning, routing, approving of incoming invoices), processes from customer support, and HR processes.

    Not too surprising, one of the biggest challenges for organizations is actually defining and agreeing upon the process.  As I have mentioned time and time again in this blog, my number one recommendation and point of focus with organizations implementing Business Process Management is on the Statement of Work (SOW) because if you cannot correctly define your process in a simple format, then you are not ready to automate it using BPM software.  I think the conclusions of this study undeniably support this statement.

    One last note of interest is that despite claims by most BPM vendors that their tool is for “business managers,” fully 30% of all BPM projects originate in the IT department.  The reason is simple - most BPM projects involve integration with existing applications and integrations always involve IT.

    Conclusions:  spend the time and money on your SOW.  Define your business process or workflow before trying to automate it.  But DO IT - the payoffs are significant and pretty darn quick.

     
  • Ramiro

    Going Paperless – the Challenges of Changing the Culture of Paper when implementing BPM Software

    ramiro.cuentas 4:09 pm on November 25, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: automated process, , BPM tool, business process designer, control processes, culture of paper, electronic forms, process automation

    The culture of paper in a business today is still considered important. It provides a means of support and evidence for activities that are carried out in a process. Any migration to an automated BPM system needs to consider how to change the culture of paper that most of the process actors will have grown accustomed to. In many cases, paper will have become a necessary part of the control processes in the organization. However, the integrity and reliability of the information are aspects that must be managed by the BPM system and the designer of the process.

    In a non automated process, the paper trail serves as the de facto audit trail of the process. However, often, the use of paper is unnecessary in the flow of activities. The process actors are simply accustomed to the use of paper, without taking into account the costs involved for the business. So, in order to make a change, we need to change the perspective of the user who is stuck in his “culture of paper”. This change of attitude should be considered an important pillar for successful process automation.

    When the business process designer wants to implement an automated process, they should not plan on maintaining the same quantity of generated paper. If they do, then they are not thinking correctly about the benefits that BPM can provide. One of the more obvious advantages of BPM should be a reduction in paper forms in favour of electronic forms. An electronic form has a number of benefits over paper forms. One of the most basic advantages is the ability to perform validation checks on data entered which in turn allows for automatic routing and flow decisions.

    The change from paper to paperless will place some stress on an organization. As a result, it is essential to have a commitment from Management to the process. And this commitment must be communicated to the process actors.

    According to the aspects mentioned above, processes automation can be regarded as a change to the organizational culture. This has been defined as “a certain sum of values and norms that are shared by individuals and groups in an organization and that control the way they interact with each other and with the organizational environment. The organizational values are beliefs and ideas about the type of goals and how appropriate they should achieve. The values of the organization develop standards, guidelines and expectations that determine an appropriate behaviour of the employees in particular situations and control the behaviour of organizational members to one another “(Hill and Jones, 2001). The organizational change is required to turn the organization into a competitive organization and involves the adoption of tools such as a BPM tool.

    Organizational culture should not be overlooked when considering the challenges of moving towards a paperless or more automated business.  Although the productivity gains can be huge, there needs to be a serious commitment from management in order to



     
  • Brian

    The Leave of Absence Request Process - Not so simple for many BPM and Form Vendors

    brian 8:33 am on November 19, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , HRM, Human Resources Management, , Leave of Absence Request, Time Off Request,

    Ask your BPM vendor to give you a demo of his/her Leave of Absence Request Process (he might call it a Vacation Request Process or Time Off Request Process, but it is all the same).  This is the simplest process in the book, right?  Think again.  This relatively simple process can be very difficult for lots of so called “top” BPM vendors and is nearly impossible to do correctly for all of the electronic forms providers.  Let’s figure out why.

    Many vendors will show you a Leave of Absence Request Process which has a Leave Request Form which gets routed to a supervisor and the supervisor either approves or rejects the request.  Seems simple.  But is that really the way a Leave Absence Request works?  No, not at all.

    PROCESS MAP

    Here is an image of a Leave of Absence Process that has been designed correctly:

    Leave of Absence Request Process

    Leave of Absence Request Process

    This is generally what a Leave of Absence or Time off Request should look like.   It is not as simple as just sending a form to your boss.  He/She needs to be able to approve or reject the request.  But notice that rejecting the request is not the same as killing it and putting it in the trash.  A rejection normally needs to go back to the employee so that the employee can correct it, resubmit it, or do something else.  The important point here is that this is a decision that should rest with the originator of the request.  Think about how it would work with an old fashion paper paper request.  If you take a request to your boss and he/she rejects it, does your boss take the request and crumple it up and throw it out?  No, your boss will hand it back to you and give you a reason why it is being rejected.  At this point, you can make your decision how to proceed.  You could throw it out yourself or you could fix it and resubmit it.

    Next comes a part of the process that almost everyone leaves out.  Once you come back from your time off, the amount of time off you really took needs to be verified.  What if you come back a day early?  What if you come back a day late?  How does the system know this?  For this reason, there needs to be another step to “report the actual leave taken.”  This then needs to be verified by the boss, and only then can the record be updated.

    Now this begs the question about “updating the record.”  Do you already have an HRM (Human Resources Management) system, or do you need your BPM system to manage this information.  Larger companies will tend to have a separate HRM system, but smaller ones might not.  In this case, it is nice if your BPM system allows you to create internal tables.  In this way you can associate custom tables with your user tables and maintain leave data for each employee.  Of course, you will also need to setup an auto scheduled process which will affect these tables.  This process should automatically add additional days to each employee’s account based on their anniversary date.  For example, if your policy is to add 2 weeks of vacation time to each employee after they have been with the company for 12 months, then this process needs to happen automatically and needs to automatically adjust the leave taken tables.

    Finally, you will need to be sure that your leave tables have an audit log.  At some point you will need to look at a record of events that affected this accounting of leave taken.

    FORMS

    With regards to the design of the workflow, let’s look at a sample initial form:

    Leave of Absence Form

    Leave of Absence Form

    The important thing to note about this initial form is that the employee, time, date, employee’s boss, leave available, and leave already taken should all be auto-filled by the system.

    APPROVAL AND MANAGEMENT VIA EMAIL

    Another feature to ask about is email response/approvals.  Management generally doesn’t want to spend time logging into more web based systems.  So why not give them the ability to approve or reject a request directly from their within their email.  Here is an example of the type of email they could receive for a leave request:

    Email Leave of Absence Request Form

    Email Leave of Absence Request Form

    As you can see, even for a seemingly simple workflow such as a Leave of Absence Request, there are a number of things to consider in the design and implementation of the process.  Failure to consider these issues will result in a system that is discarded within a few weeks and never really used by the company.  This is a very common occurrence in the world of software, but one that can be avoided with good planning, testing, and implementation practices.

     
  • Amy

    BPM Culture Wars

    Amy 10:15 am on November 3, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , culture

    In today’s hyperlinked world of iPhone, Facebook, Twitter, and countless other digital networking tools, it’s easy to assume that all organizations embrace technology as a better way of managing business.  However, it’s easy to forget that attitudes towards technology can vary greatly from one business to another, and can profoundly impact a business’ readiness to implement a BPM system, or any software system for that matter.  It’s vitally important to take a long hard look at organizational attitudes towards technology, and take this account before embarking on a BPM project.

    The issue of business process management and attitudes towards technology recently surfaced in a discussion I had with the executive director of a small legal firm.  She can count her entire team on one hand, yet she struggles to coordinate document management, schedule sharing, filing deadlines, mailings, meetings, and tasks among the small group.  I am usually ready to tout the benefits of a BPM system as a great solution to an organization’s efficiency and coordination problems.  But as I listened, I learned that this small office faces a much greater challenge than process coordination inefficiencies.  They suffer from technophobia.

    I was surprised to see the extent of this organization’s strong resistance to all forms of technology.  It went beyond a reluctance to automate manual tasks, or a lack of enthusiasm for learning a new system.  In this case, the CEO genuinely sees technology as a barrier to doing her job effectively.  She would rather mail paper copies than e-file, doesn’t see the point in having a company website, uses a generic gmail account for the company email address, prefers managing data in Word tables rather than Excel files, and admits that she not yet mastered control-alt-delete to escape from the occasional frozen screen.

    In light of the CEO’s firmly-held resistance to technology, a BPM system may not be the solution to the company’s problems.  Simply put, this organization’s culture is not ready to contemplate a switch to electronic process management.  If a company is stymied by the most basic of computer operations, then a BPM system is not going to feel like a comfortable leap, and certainly won’t be perceived as a valuable tool.  For all the potential benefits of a BPM system in efficiency gains, ROI, and overall improvements to office sanity, the arguments will fall on deaf ears if the company’s culture has not embraced technology as a means to a more productive end.  And if technology itself is viewed as a barrier to effectiveness, then that company is not a great candidate for a business process management system.  At least not yet.

    That’s not to say that this company will remain in the stone age forever, and won’t be ready to transition to a BPM system at some point down the road.  What it does mean is that when we consider the potential success and ROI of a particular BPM implementation, it’s vital to consider how that organization has incorporated new technology in the past, and how it views technology as part of its strategy to provide superior products and services in the future.  Without that vision and culture in place, the BPM implementation becomes all the more difficult from a logistical standpoint, and the organization risks missing the point of BPM.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel