Latest Updates: bpm software RSS

  • Amy

    Leave Application Workflow, with and without BPM

    Amy 9:10 am on March 11, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bpm software, , , , , leave application process, vacation request form

    I have been blogging recently about BPM software and opportunities for automation in a typical leave application process.  I wanted to create a visual example to show how many steps can be automated by using a BPM tool to automate the vacation request process.  Requesting a vacation should be a fairly simple and straightforward process, right?  An employee asks for vacation days, a supervisor checks the request against the employee’s HR records, the request is approved or denied, and the HR records are updated.  Simple, right?

    Not so much.  In order for that paper-based vacation request form to be processed properly, it has to pass through many steps and desks before it is ultimately approved.  Take a look at this example process diagram showing a typical paper-based leave application workflow:

    Leave Application Process without BPM Software

    Each extra step wastes time and effort:  asking people to do things, sending emails, checking and updating databases by hand, and manually reviewing data are administrative tasks that could be automated and streamlined with BPM software.

    Now, let’s look at the same process, automated with the help of a BPM software suite:

    Leave Application Process With BPM Software

    In the BPM-automated process, the administrative waste is cut out.   The employee’s vacation data is automatically pulled from the HR database and added side-by-side to the vacation request form, so when the Supervisor reviews the form she has all the information she needs to make the decision to approve or deny the request.

    Information is also pulled from, and pushed into the HR database.  See how the HR department staff doesn’t even participate in the automated process diagram?  By automating the administrative, communicative, and labor-intensive tasks, the BPM system trims the fat from the leave application process.

     
  • Brian

    5 Simple Questions to see if your Business Process can be modeled and Automated using Workflow Software

    brian 9:54 pm on September 13, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bpm software, , , ,

    I receive questions literally every day from companies that are looking for workflow software and/or business process management software to automate workflows and automate web-form processing.   Most of my team tell me that I am the worst sales person they have ever seen.  You see, after 10 minutes on a phone call I will often tell a potential customer that his/her process cannot be modeled in workflow software and cannot be automated using business process management software and bpm technology.   And then I will often recommend another type of software and another software company.

    Most companies can’t afford to turn away leads.  But the fact is that as a successful open source company, we cannot afford not to turn them away.  Open Source is a brutally honest profession - we don’t hide anything.  All of our internal technical discussions are online, all of our manuals and screencasts are online, and yes - all of our code is open source.  So, it only comes to follow that we should be just as brutally honest in helping our potential users figure out if business process management software is the right solution for them.  So, here are a couple of questions that I like to ask to quickly figure out if the person/company on the other end of a phone call should bother looking at BPM software as a solution to his company’s problem.

    1) How many employees do you have?  If the answer is ” under 25 employees,”  then I can be 90% certain that you don’t need BPM Software, Workflow Automation Software, or anything similar.  Smaller companies value flexibility and agility much more than they value control, stability, and repeatability.  After all, if you are a small company, you are still trying to figure out your recipe for success, right?  If you already had the recipe, you’d be much bigger.  And as is the case with most recipes, there is no sense writing it down and passing it on, unless you are darn sure it is the right one.  Nobody follows grandma’s spaghetti sauce recipe unless it is good! With that said, you will notice that I don’t say 100% certain but rather 90% certain that you don’t need Business Process Management Software.  The 10% of small firms that do need it usually offer/sell very high value add, very specialized, and very highly paid niche services which unite several disparate parties in a very industry specific workflow.  In other words - not a local bakery.   Finance boutiques, specialty insurance, risk analysis, etc. - these may be small teams but they are run using very specific and formal processes, hence they are an ideal candidate for BPM.

    2) Can you send me a diagram of your workflow in any format (PPT, word, PDF, excel, etc.)?  If the answer is no, then the company has not yet reached process maturity.  Again, this is highly related to #1.  Your process needs to be mature and successful enough to warrant being written down.  I know of almost no exceptions to the following rule - A company must have first written down its process before attempting to model it in Workflow Software.

    3) What is unique about your process?  If the person on the other end of the phone describes the need for a CRM software to manage their sales process, and they are selling widgets just like the rest of the world, then I am not going to tell them to start trying to build a CRM package inside their BPM.  They could - but WHY?!?  CRM is a particular process, i.e. a subset of what is covered in BPM Software.  However, it is an extremely popular and well used process.  As a result, there are a lot of vendors that have fully built this process into a software exclusively dedicated to the process of CRM.  So - USE IT!  No need to re-invent the wheel.  The same goes for ERP.  About 15-20% of the customers I speak to really need an off-the-shelf CRM or ERP software, and I can usually figure this out in about 10 minutes.

    4) Are you looking for Project Management Software?  - This is the other question I am asking in the back of my mind as I am talking to a potential customer.  I haven’t quite figured it out yet, but there is another high percentage of people out there that think they are looking for business process management software or workflow automation software but they are really looking for project or team management software.  And, truth be told, most of the project management options around are total garbage (especially MS Project) so it is probably no surprise that everyone is looking for a better option (hint :) hint -big opportunity).   So, again, you could build this in your BPM - but there are some tricky issues to deal with here that most BPMs don’t do well.  The reason here is that Project Management is often more about communication and collaboration than process flow.

    5) Do you say “process management,” “order,” “control” but mean “collaboration,” “”messaging,” and “negotiation”?  Lots of small business owners think they have a process.  But in reality, they have a loose collaboration or conversation and without that conversation there is no way that they can get the customer what he/she needs. Again, this tends to be true with small companies, primarily because only small companies have the liberty of selling something so unique that it can only be resolved with lots of collaboration and conversation.  Larger firms don’t have this luxury and smaller firms that want to scale also don’t have this luxury.  It all goes back to the idea of the recipe - all businesses when they start out are looking for a recipe for success.  Once they have it, they will tend to institutionalize it, and then hire people to repeat the process over and over.  This is called “growth.”  BPM Software or Workflow Software or whatever you want to call it is ideal for mid-sized growing companies or larger companies.  There is really no secret as to why.  BPM Software is all about favoring convention over freedom and repeatability over flexibility.

    By the way, I love my local bakery and am very happy they don’t use BPM Software!

     
  • Brian

    MIT OpenCourseWare Project and the lessons of Open Source Software

    brian 8:51 pm on August 24, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bpm software, education,

    MIT now offers 1,800 courses for free online. A number of other premier universities are also leading the way by doing the same. They are not just putting course notes or a syllabus online. No, they are putting the full course online - lectures, notes and recorded videos.

    Is this incredible? Is this the signal of the end of the on campus university experience in which a student (or his parents) pays in excess of $100k to go to a top tier university? Maybe everyone will now just stay home, get a good broad band connection and sit in their rooms somewhere for four years while they take all the courses for free?

    Or is all of this just some sort of big marketing move on the part of MIT?

    The answer is both yes and no.

    Open Source software companies have long understood the value of giving something away. It builds brand, builds community, provides instant feedback on new product releases, and can quickly catapult a brand to the top of the fray. Most software companies now also understand the danger of not giving something away. It is tough to compete these days against the likes of a SugarCRM, Mindtouch, Openbravo, Pentaho, Knowledgetree, or ProcessMaker. These companies drive so much traffic and so many hundreds of downloads each day that a newcomer in their respective software genres has very little chance of competing. This gets magnified by a loyal community following which provides lightening fast feedback whenever new features are released so that the software continues to improve at a pace that further weakens any would be competitors.

    Open Source Software is not just about giving away a small freebie or limited edition software. It is about giving away the whole enchilada – the full code. This is commercially viable under the assumption that totally pervasive distribution of a software product is worth more than the potential lost sales to those same users. This, of course, is possible only if a company has a plan to then sell higher value add services (premium services) to the much larger user base it acquires by giving away its software.

    Thousands of students and small companies in developing countries download my company’s open source bpm software every week. Why would I want to stop them? If we chose to sell our software, most would never have paid for it. Or if they would have, the cost of engaging with them and collecting money from them would not have covered the associated costs. But these same users may later join larger companies where the value of support and other premium services will be much larger than the revenue potential of selling to them when they were smaller and less able and willing to pay.

    The most successful commercial open source companies are the ones that do the best job of offering real free and open value while also delivering true differentiated premium services that a segment of their market wants to pay for.

    So, let’s turn back to the universities. They actually have always had a much better reason to give away their content (i.e. courses) than the open source software companies. The reasoning is simple – they have an incredible bundled premium service and there are people that are willing to pay for it. When you sign up for MIT’s premium plan for $100k + per year, you get the following:

    1. Physical experience – you are on a beautiful campus on the Charles river in Cambridge and this is the ideal setting for true contemplation for 4 years
    2. Access to the professors – you can actually talk to them and form a lasting relationship
    3. Network – MIT has pretty rigorous entrance requirements, so if you pay to go and they accept you, you gain access to a network which may help you find a spouse, a job, a business deal, and other significant relationships for the rest of your life
    4. Collaboration – real collaboration with other students – after all that’s where the real learning ocurrs
    5. A diploma to hang on your wall – it may just look like a piece of paper, but if the right person walks into your office later in life and sees it on the wall it could be worth a lot to you

    So does giving away its courses in any way jeopardize MIT’s ability to sell to this premium group? No, in fact it does just the opposite. MIT’s superior free offering will make it’s name and brand so universally known in the coming years that it will probably edge out its other rivals (Harvard and the rest of the ivy league) to the point that the value of the MIT diploma only goes up. Therefore, they will expand their base of those willing to pay for their premium services.

    Of course, at the same time, MIT will spawn a whole new industry which will appear mostly in the developing world but probably even to a lesser degree at colleges in the US (maybe this is the answer for Obama’s plan to breathe life into community colleges). Without a doubt, a legion of facilitators will appear at these institutions to “help” students take MIT courses. The institutions will make use of their classrooms to bring together local students and teacher’s aids to help students take the video taped MIT courses.

    These institutions will, of course, charge tuition for access to these free courses and may even issue local credit in their institution’s name brand for students that take the course through them. Does this sound unfair to MIT or somehow strange? Well, it shouldn’t. This is exactly what happens with free software. Just look online at all the companies offering services around the most popular open source software packages. The vast majority are not official distributors or partners of the software company. They are simply tapping into the demand created by the companies massive open source machine.

    I would assume that MIT has already thought about these consequences. And if they believe that they are entitled to some revenue from all of the revenue that will be made from these other universities using their courses, then they simply need to turn once again to the open source software industry and see how it solves this problem. I’ll give MIT a hint (you need to attract, retain, and certify your distribution channel :).

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel